maria-developers team mailing list archive

[Alexi1952 <Alexi1952@xxxxxxxxx>]

>  The issue is much harder than this, as we have to support replication between
>  master and slave of different versions.

Agree. Thank you! I missed this version mismatch :(

21.12.09, 11:10, "Kristian Nielsen" <knielsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> worklog-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>  
>  > +Also we should notice the introduction of the BINLOG_SEND_ANNOTATE_ROWS_EVENT
>  > +flag taking into account that MySQL/Sun may also introduce a flag with the
>  > +same value to be used in the request_dump-mysql_binlog_send interface.
>  > +But this is mainly the question of merging: if a conflict concerning this
>  > +flag occur, we may simply change the BINLOG_SEND_ANNOTATE_ROWS_EVENT value
>  > +(this does not require additional changes in the code).
>  
>  The issue is much harder than this, as we have to support replication between
>  master and slave of different versions. So we cannot just change the value of
>  flags sent between master and slave, at least not without adding code to make
>  sure such a change is both forward and backwards compatible.
>  
>  I still think the correct approach here is to contact MySQL developers and
>  make sure we coordinate the allocation of flags and constants. (If MySQL
>  should for some reason refuse to do this, we will at least have tried, and
>  besides I see no reason they would do this if approached politely).
>  
>   - Kristian.
>  
>  

-- 
Здесь спама нет http://mail.yandex.ru/nospam/sign