| Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
On 2015-03-25 03:29, Aalekh Nigam wrote:
With *MySql version 5.6* Benchmarking test had given to significant advantage to HandlerSocket (processing 750,000 Qps) over Memcached InnoDB plugin (420,000 QPS). here: https://github.com/entering/miscellaneous/blob/master/benchmarks/handler-socket.md
In the test, which results you cite, Yoshinori Matsunobu was comparing HandlerSocket to standalone Memcached, not InnoDB Memcached plugin.
See: http://yoshinorimatsunobu.blogspot.pt/2010/10/using-mysql-as-nosql-story-for.html .
Link to the recent benchmarking test with version 5.7: http://dimitrik.free.fr/blog/archives/2013/11/mysql-performance-over-1m-qps-with-innodb-memcached-plugin-in-mysql-57.html
You cannot compare these benchmarks, because Yoshinori and DimitriK were using very different machines. Yoshinori was performing his tests on 2.5GHz x 8 core Nehalem, whereas DimitriK was using 2Ghz * 48 core machine.
Piotr
| Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
