maria-developers team mailing list archive

[Sanja <sanja.byelkin@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, the decision is right. I'll check later the code on github.

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Varun Gupta <varungupta1803@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Hi,
> I had been going through the LEX struct and could not find any flag member
> there which could be used to specify if a function is aggregate or not. So
> i created the new flag inside sp_head, so as to make sure it could be used
> for stored procedures too in the future.
> I have committed the changes on GitHub :)
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Vicențiu Ciorbaru <cvicentiu@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Varun,
>>
>> Getting the parser to accept the syntax is a good first step. Writing
>> tests is the correct way to go also.
>>
>> Now we need to have a way to pass this extra information to the part of
>> the code that stores / executes this procedure. When we encounter this
>> AGGREGATE_SYM syntax we have to record it somewhere. We generally use the
>> LEX structure for this. See if there is any flag member within it that you
>> can use for this purpose. If you can't find any, you can potentially create
>> one yourself.
>>
>> Now, it would be a good time to try and familiarize yourself with how we
>> get from having a regular parsed function to storing it and afterwards
>> executing it. This is the main logic that we have to deal with. I'm not
>> going to suggest you any specific thing to do right now as there are
>> multiple ways to do this. Try and come up with a simple plan on how to
>> extend this functionality for our use case. You don't have to code it all,
>> just yet :). We'll improve (or perhaps change it) afterwards. It doesn't
>> have to be perfect the first time, but this way you'll get a try at
>> designing an implementation idea.
>>
>> Great job so far!
>> Vicentiu
>>
>> On Mon, 23 May 2016 at 09:04 Varun Gupta <varungupta1803@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> As in my previous mail I have added the FETCH statement to the parser
>>> and have tested it, when the syntax is correct . Now I am writing test that
>>> would also give an error for incorrect syntax. Also I would like how to
>>> proceed further :).
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
>>> Post to     : maria-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>
>