maria-discuss team mailing list archive

[Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Am 16.02.2015 um 22:53 schrieb Vadim Pestovnikov:
> Thank you Reindl.
>
> So basically what that means is that mariadb is not 100% compatable with
> percona and  mysql?

define 100% - replication is a *binary log*

if it would be identical in every aspect it would exist only one product 
and even if all docs pretend 100% compatibility i would never come to 
the idea even run different minor versions in a replication setup

just follow these instructions leads to the conclusion mix different 
products is a bad idea: 
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/replication-upgrade.html

P.S.: i don't appreciate off-list replies

> On Feb 16, 2015 1:23 PM, "Reindl Harald" <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     Am 16.02.2015 um 22:19 schrieb Vadim Pestovnikov:
>
>         Error in Log_event::read_log_event(): 'Found invalid event in binary
>         log', data_len: 44, event_type: 33
>
>         Error reading relay log event: slave SQL thread aborted because
>         of I/O error
>
>         My slave is MariaDB 10 with data and logs partitions encrypted
>         by LUKS
>         and with SSL enabled. As far as RDS and Percona servers don't
>         use SSL I
>         am using non SSL user for the replication.
>
>         Any recommendations or suggestions would be extremely appreciated
>
>
>     don't mix different server versions in replication setups
>
>     there is a good reason why it is recommended always to update first
>     the slaves, run "mysql_upgrade" and then the masters to be 100% sure
>     that the maste rnever don't write anything into the binlog the slave
>     won't understand because differences in details

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature