mimblewimble team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: On the Code of Conduct
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 9:34 PM, Casey Rodarmor <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:39 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> <lkcl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> except, as i've patiently mentioned each time people very kindly contribute
>> their insights: the project leader, ignatius, has made it absolutely
>> clear that any efforts to provide insights - even sadly yours, casey,
>> are neither necessary nor needed. the "pathological 100% certainty
>> decision" has already been made, in advance.
> This isn't the case. The comment was that the community and
> contributors seem happy,
... without actually consulting them... which makes it extremely hard
for them to say "actually, i disagree..". which is actually in some
ways a much more important secondary issue than anything that the
actual toxic document.
> that nobody seemed terrorized, and that the
> code of conduct has been applied thoughtfully. This squares with my
> own observations.
*sigh* sometimes it's just not possible to see past the mental
filters of our own making. and that's ok, you know?
> I don't think that Igno has anything to apologize for, or that backers
> will care one whit.
given that there's been no response from ignotius, i will definitely
be informing people that the project is run unethically, and should
not be invested in.
> Please stop issuing ultimatums and making ungrounded predictions about
> the project failing. It simply isn't helpful.
i hear what you're saying: however that's not for you or me to decide
[and definitely not for you to tell me what i should or should not do,
apologies if that wasn't your intent to imply that]. it's up to
readers of the archives to decide for themselves.
> I've said everything that I feel needs to be said, so I won't belabor
> the point further.
it's ok, casey.