← Back to team overview

mimblewimble team mailing list archive

Re: On the Code of Conduct


On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 9:34 PM, Casey Rodarmor <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:39 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> <lkcl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> except, as i've patiently mentioned each time people very kindly contribute
>> their insights: the project leader, ignatius, has made it absolutely
>> clear that any efforts to provide insights - even sadly yours, casey,
>> are neither necessary nor needed.  the "pathological 100% certainty
>> decision" has already been made, in advance.
> This isn't the case. The comment was that the community and
> contributors seem happy,

 ... without actually consulting them... which makes it extremely hard
for them to say "actually, i disagree..".  which is actually in some
ways a much more important secondary issue than anything that the
actual toxic document.

> that nobody seemed terrorized, and that the
> code of conduct has been applied thoughtfully. This squares with my
> own observations.

 *sigh* sometimes it's just not possible to see past the mental
filters of our own making.  and that's ok, you know?

> I don't think that Igno has anything to apologize for, or that backers
> will care one whit.

 given that there's been no response from ignotius, i will definitely
be informing people that the project is run unethically, and should
not be invested in.

> Please stop issuing ultimatums and making ungrounded predictions about
> the project failing. It simply isn't helpful.

 i hear what you're saying: however that's not for you or me to decide
[and definitely not for you to tell me what i should or should not do,
apologies if that wasn't your intent to imply that].  it's up to
readers of the archives to decide for themselves.

> I've said everything that I feel needs to be said, so I won't belabor
> the point further.

 it's ok, casey.


Follow ups