Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
+1 Em 05/02/2011 10:19, Tim Cook escreveu: > Hi All, > > I hope that everyone will comment on this. At least give a +1 or a -1 > so we can gauge the sentiment on it. :-) > > Previously we have issued OSHIP under a dual-license model using the MPL > and GPL to meet users needs. Though fairly common this does seem to > cause confusion and it does hurt OSHIP distribution into the "Free > Software" world. > > With the next generation of OSHIP (OSHIPpy 2.x) it will be much less > tied to it's own framework and in fact will be an installable egg; so > it'll be available as a library to application developers. > > The LGPL license seems to meet the needs in order to keep the purist > Free Software folks happy as well as allowing people to build commercial > closed source applications using OSHIP. > > So if you agree to licensing OSHIP 2.x as LGPL please reply with a +1. > If you disagree to licensing OSHIP 2.x as LGPL please reply with a -1. > > Of course general comments and questions are encouraged as well. > > Cheers, > Tim > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mlhim-owners > Post to : mlhim-owners@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mlhim-owners > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antivírus e acredita-se estar livre de perigo.
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |