mlhim-owners team mailing list archive

[Roger Erens <roger.erens@xxxxxxxxx>]

+1

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 13:19, Tim Cook <timothywayne.cook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I hope that everyone will comment on this.  At least give a +1 or a -1
> so we can gauge the sentiment on it.  :-)
>
> Previously we have issued OSHIP under a dual-license model using the MPL
> and GPL to meet users needs.  Though fairly common this does seem to
> cause confusion and it does hurt OSHIP distribution into the "Free
> Software" world.
>
> With the next generation of OSHIP (OSHIPpy 2.x) it will be much less
> tied to it's own framework and in fact will be an installable egg; so
> it'll be available as a library to application developers.
>
> The LGPL license seems to meet the needs in order to keep the purist
> Free Software folks happy as well as allowing people to build commercial
> closed source applications using OSHIP.
>
> So if you agree to licensing OSHIP 2.x as LGPL please reply with a +1.
> If you disagree to licensing OSHIP 2.x as LGPL please reply with a -1.
>
> Of course general comments and questions are encouraged as well.
>
> Cheers,
> Tim
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> ***************************************************************
> Timothy Cook, MSc
> Project Lead - Multi-Level Healthcare Information Modeling
> http://www.mlhim.org
>
> LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
> Skype ID == timothy.cook
> Academic.Edu Profile: http://uff.academia.edu/TimothyCook
>
> You may get my Public GPG key from  popular keyservers or
> from this link http://timothywayne.cook.googlepages.com/home
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mlhim-owners
> Post to     : mlhim-owners@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mlhim-owners
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>