Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
> > Nope -- I haven't yet encountered a setter annotation, only getters. You > didn't answer the question: what does it mean to have a field with a > getteruserlevel but not a setteruserlevel? Does it mean it can't be set? Or > does it default to the same as the getter? > It means that the value cannot be changed. -- *Prageeth Silva*
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |