← Back to team overview

mylvmbackup-discuss team mailing list archive

Fwd: rationale behind posdir construction


That reply should have gone to the list, sorry about that.
Does anybody object to removing the code? It would make mylvmbackup
require to work with LVMv2 only, but I would assume that's not a problem

 Lenz Grimmer <lenz@xxxxxxxxxxx>                             -o)
 [ICQ: 160767607 | Jabber: LenZGr@xxxxxxxxxx]                /\\
 http://www.lenzg.org/                                       V_V

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lenz Grimmer <lenz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, May 20, 2009 at 21:34
Subject: Re: [Mylvmbackup-discuss] rationale behind posdir construction
To: Tim Stoop <tim.stoop@xxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 20:29, Tim Stoop <tim.stoop@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If I create a patch to reverse this, will it be accepted? I'd hate to
> create a patch, apply it to my production setup only to have to create
> my own packages from there on after... If you won't accept it, I'll
> have to think of another solution.

I'd be inclined to accept it. Or does anybody on this list have a strong
opinion about keeping this construct? It would certainly make the code a
bit more readable.

 Lenz Grimmer <lenz@xxxxxxxxxxx>                             -o)
 [ICQ: 160767607 | Jabber: LenZGr@xxxxxxxxxx]                /\\
 http://www.lenzg.org/                                       V_V

Follow ups