mysql-proxy-discuss team mailing list archive

[manohar s <manoharyes@xxxxxxxxx>]

Is it possible for a 0.7.2a release with this fix?

Manohar

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:03 PM, manohar s <manoharyes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> For me this is reproducible only on windows. Linux 32 bit binaries are
> working fine.
>
> I have filed a report here:
>
> http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=45996&thanks=4
>
> Manohar
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Kay Röpke <Kay.Roepke@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Jul 7, 2009, at 9:05 AM, manohar s wrote:
>>
>>  Also,  http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=41417 is not yet fixed.  I can
>>> see
>>> from the comment that there was an attempt for fixing this, was this in
>>> different branch?
>>>
>>
>> mmmh. good catch, this must've slipped by.
>> I see it currently as targetted for 0.8, but I will bring it up again.
>>
>>  Manohar
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 11:43 AM, manohar s <manoharyes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi,
>>>>
>>>> If you execute:
>>>>
>>>> print(string.format("%x",proxy.PROXY_VERSION))
>>>>
>>>> It is giving 72, But this has to be 702.
>>>>
>>>> It is reproducible with MySQL proxy version 0.7.2.
>>>>
>>>
>> indeed. wonder how that happened.
>> could you please file a bug on it?
>> It is reproducible by simply using the tutorial-constants.lua script in
>> share/doc/mysql-proxy/ (also on other platforms).
>>
>> thanks,
>> -k
>> --
>> Kay Roepke
>> Software Engineer, MySQL Enterprise Tools
>>
>> Sun Microsystems GmbH    Sonnenallee 1, DE-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
>> Geschaeftsfuehrer:    Thomas Schroeder,  Wolfang Engels,  Wolf Frenkel
>> Vorsitz d. Aufs.rat.: Martin Haering                    HRB MUC 161028
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> hope is the only thing which keeps us all happy
> http://sqlyog.wordpress.com/
>



-- 
hope is the only thing which keeps us all happy