nova team mailing list archive
-
nova team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00135
Re: Twisted or Eventlet?
-
From:
Rick Clark <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Sat, 07 Aug 2010 08:03:20 -0500
-
Cc:
"nova@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <nova@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
In-reply-to:
<AANLkTik6J7G7gP8YxVs=M+5L3-knnbygYgHp12YqO7jt@mail.gmail.com>
-
Openpgp:
id=DF41F834
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1 ThunderBrowse/3.3.1
On 08/04/2010 01:35 PM, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> I'm not actually arguing either way, but if I had to make this
> decision, I'd have a slightly more even comparison between eventlet
> and twisted. Twisted is stable, well known, has several maintainers,
> and *many* users. Canonical, Google, Apple, ITA, and many many other
> use Twisted. You can trust on it being around and well maintained in
> the foreseeable future.
I am not making a judgment here, but I agree with Gustavo. I think the
health and viability of a project should be considered in it's
selection. The decision isn't purely technical.
On another note, this is not an either/or question. Twisted does many
things that eventlet does not, they are not mutually exclusive.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Follow ups
References
-
Twisted or Eventlet?
From: Eric Day, 2010-07-29
-
Re: Twisted or Eventlet?
From: Ed Leafe, 2010-07-29
-
Re: Twisted or Eventlet?
From: Michael Gundlach, 2010-07-29
-
Re: Twisted or Eventlet?
From: Soren Hansen, 2010-07-29
-
Re: Twisted or Eventlet?
From: Michael Gundlach, 2010-07-30
-
Re: Twisted or Eventlet?
From: Jay Pipes, 2010-07-30
-
Re: Twisted or Eventlet?
From: Eric Day, 2010-07-30
-
Re: Twisted or Eventlet?
From: Vishvananda Ishaya, 2010-07-30
-
Re: Twisted or Eventlet?
From: Eric Day, 2010-08-02
-
Re: Twisted or Eventlet?
From: Soren Hansen, 2010-08-03
-
Re: Twisted or Eventlet?
From: Michael Gundlach, 2010-08-04
-
Re: Twisted or Eventlet?
From: Gustavo Niemeyer, 2010-08-04