openerp-community team mailing list archive
-
openerp-community team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06504
Re: OCA repositories naming convention
On 2014-07-10 01:49, Franco Tampieri wrote:
> So the final structure will be like that:
>
> -> Manifacture
> -> Manifacture (include workflow for MRP and MRP2, Materials etc. etc.)
> -> Manifacture-reporting (include al the report like better BOM
> representation or better Plan list of work etc. etc.)
>
> Is equal to the actual structure proposed by OCA.
Really? Where?
> But I think that rename Manufacture in Manufacture-workflow will be more
> cleaver, do you agree?
No I don't. It would be unique and therefore confusing.
Martin
Follow ups
References
-
OCA repositories naming convention
From: Yannick Vaucher, 2014-06-27
-
Re: OCA repositories naming convention
From: Leonardo "LeartS" Donelli, 2014-07-07
-
Re: OCA repositories naming convention
From: Yannick Vaucher, 2014-07-07
-
Re: OCA repositories naming convention
From: Ana Juaristi, 2014-07-08
-
Re: OCA repositories naming convention
From: Nhomar Hernández, 2014-07-08
-
Re: OCA repositories naming convention
From: Ana Juaristi, 2014-07-08
-
Re: OCA repositories naming convention
From: Lorenzo Battistini, 2014-07-09
-
Re: OCA repositories naming convention
From: Ana Juaristi, 2014-07-09
-
Re: OCA repositories naming convention
From: Nhomar Hernández, 2014-07-09
-
Re: OCA repositories naming convention
From: Martin Collins, 2014-07-09
-
Re: OCA repositories naming convention
From: Franco Tampieri, 2014-07-09
-
Re: OCA repositories naming convention
From: Ana Juaristi, 2014-07-09
-
Re: OCA repositories naming convention
From: Franco Tampieri, 2014-07-10