openerp-expert-localization team mailing list archive

["Nhomar Hernandez \(Vauxoo\)" <question216251@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Question #216251 on OpenERP Addons changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/openobject-addons/+question/216251

    Status: Answered => Open

Nhomar Hernandez (Vauxoo) is still having a problem:
Hello maxime I know the typonomous facto srandard.

But several inconvenience are if we dont have inside the core or a minimal
base of data structure.

I passed 4 options. Im totally agreed about all data preloaded is bad.

In the list a good option appear. But what im looking for is that the base
modules manage in the best possible way this generic minimal data and avoid
to as much people as we can expend time in this no-brain need.

Thanks for your opinion
On Dec 8, 2012 12:31 PM, "Maxime Chambreuil (http://www.savoirfairelinux.com)"
<question216251@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Your question #216251 on OpenERP Addons changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/openobject-addons/+question/216251
>
> Maxime Chambreuil (http://www.savoirfairelinux.com) posted a new comment:
> I think OpenERP should not contain any states by default. It might
> already be too much data for a company to have the whole list of
> countries, when their customers and suppliers are national.
>
> Regarding each module providing the list of states, there is already a
> de facto standard for their name: l10n_XX_toponyms. Search for toponyms
> on http://apps.openerp.com and you'll see.
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>

-- 
You received this question notification because you are a direct
subscriber of the question.