openerp-expert-production team mailing list archive

[David Mitchell <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Stephanie,

Attached is the setup - we tried to produce the results.



On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Frank, Stefanie <s.frank@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> one question: die you set the (disassembled) products on MTO or MTS?
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: openerp-expert-production-bounces+s.frank=bremskerl.de@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:openerp-expert-production-bounces+s.frank=bremskerl.de@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von David Mitchell
> Gesendet: Samstag, 29. Januar 2011 14:16
> An: openerp-expert-production@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: [Openerp-expert-production] BoM - Breakdown of Complete Productinto parts Setup/Design Question
>
> Dear Manufacturing Experts,
>
> I have a question for you to see if any of you know of a configuration
> or module on v6 to achieve this in production.
>
> Scenario
> Company buys complete product from an overseas suppliers (let's say a
> bicycle - COMPBIKE), but when they receive the item - they go through
> an operation to disassemble the COMPBIKE product into individual parts
> (e.g. frame, fork, front wheel, handlebars, seat, etc.). Like a
> reverse BoM.
>
> This is cheaper than purchasing the parts individually.
>
> Cost of complete bike $200
> Sales Price of complete bike $1000 (not that it's relevant here)
> Total Sales Price of broken down components (added together = $2500)
>
> So a single product input - explodes into multiple end products of
> various products.
>
> So the Products to Consume = COMPBIKE
> Bill of Material = COMPBIKE BREAKDOWN
>
> The finished products/subproducts
> part A - frame
> Part B - fork
> Part C - wheels * 2
> Part D - handlebar
> etc
>
> So this is a dissemble operation
> Single input (Complete Bike) --> Operation - Dissasemble COMPBIKE -->
> Finished Products - all the parts according to the COMPBIKE BREAKDOWN
> BOM
>
> What we're having trouble think through is:
> 1) Currently in OpenERP when you enter a Manufacturing Order in v6 you
> enter the name of the product you're "producing" in the MO Header
> (mrp.production.product_id) and then the Bill of Material
> (mrp.production.bom_id).
>
> Since this is a reverse operation - we believe the product_id should
> be the name of the product we're consuming versus producing - as we're
> producing multiple components with the breakdown.
>
> Secondly, instead of consuming goods related to a
> mrp.production.bom_id (inputs --> outputs (generated by BoM and
> associated subproducts list), we believe that the Finished products
> should have a BoM Associated with it maybe on the Finished Product Tab
> (so mrp.production.bom_id_reverse) is utilized.
>
> At least that is what we're initially thinking.
>
> How have others handled this situation. (using mrp_subproduct or with
> custom coding)?
>
> I guess we're asking - how have others handled the configuration of a
> Disassemble/Breakdown operation and management of the
> procurement/production orders in a dissemble operation.
>
> PLANNING
> >From a procurement standpoint - if any of the subcomponents need
> product - it may generate a manufacturing order to breakdown a
> complete bike - if they are in inventory.
>
> Thanks in advance for your insight.
>
> David Mitchell
> NovaPoint Group LLC
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-expert-production
> Post to     : openerp-expert-production@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-expert-production
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-expert-production
> Post to     : openerp-expert-production@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-expert-production
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>

Attachment: BoMExample.doc
Description: MS-Word document