openstack-doc-core team mailing list archive

["Kato, Tomoyuki" <kato.tomoyuki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm uncertain whether it is acceptable,
but I think it is worth to nominate him.

KATO Tomoyuki

> Following on from this: some of you may know Hugh Blemings, who writes the 'Last Week on OpenStack-Dev' newsletter
> (http://hugh.blemings.id.au/openstack/lwood/).
> 
> I believe Hugh provides a valuable service for the community, and I think this is probably worthy of a vote (which is
> the main benefit of ATC status after Barcelona). Do you think we should offer him extra-ATC status in docs because of
> his work with making sense of the dev list?
> 
> Interested in your thoughts.
> 
> (Disclosure: Hugh is a colleague and long-time friend of mine through Linux Australia)
> 
> Lana
> 
> 
> On 11/08/16 09:28, Lana Brindley wrote:
> > Hi cores,
> >
> > Are you aware of anyone who should be granted Extra ATC status? From Doug's email to the dev list:
> >
> >> Following the Foundation bylaws [1] and TC Charter [2], Project
> >> teams should identify contributors who have had a significant impact
> >> this cycle but who would not qualify for ATC status using the regular
> >> process because they have not submitted a patch.
> >
> > In the past, docs have given extra ATC status to people who participated in docs sprints, as an example. If you know
> of anyone, let's shop the idea on this list. We need to have our proposals to Foundation by 16 August, so we don't have
> much time.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Lana
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Lana Brindley
> Technical Writer
> Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
> http://lanabrindley.com