openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06865
Re: Swift Consistency Guarantees?
On 01/20/2012 06:35 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:17:32 -0500
> Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Thanks! So there is no way to reliably get the most-recent version of an
>> object under all conditions.
>
> If you bend the conditions hard enough to hit the CAP theorem, you do.
>From what I have heard so far, it seems to be sufficient if all servers
holding the newest replica are down for me to get old data. I don't
think that this condition is already hitting the CAP theorem, or is it?
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C
Follow ups
References
-
Swift Consistency Guarantees?
From: Nikolaus Rath, 2012-01-18
-
Re: Swift Consistency Guarantees?
From: Michael Barton, 2012-01-18
-
Re: Swift Consistency Guarantees?
From: Nikolaus Rath, 2012-01-18
-
Re: Swift Consistency Guarantees?
From: Nikolaus Rath, 2012-01-20
-
Re: Swift Consistency Guarantees?
From: Stephen Broeker, 2012-01-20
-
Re: Swift Consistency Guarantees?
From: Nikolaus Rath, 2012-01-20
-
Re: Swift Consistency Guarantees?
From: Stephen Broeker, 2012-01-20
-
Re: Swift Consistency Guarantees?
From: Nikolaus Rath, 2012-01-20
-
Re: Swift Consistency Guarantees?
From: Stephen Broeker, 2012-01-20
-
Re: Swift Consistency Guarantees?
From: Nikolaus Rath, 2012-01-20
-
Re: Swift Consistency Guarantees?
From: Stephen Broeker, 2012-01-20
-
Re: Swift Consistency Guarantees?
From: Nikolaus Rath, 2012-01-20
-
Re: Swift Consistency Guarantees?
From: Pete Zaitcev, 2012-01-20