openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #09935
Re: I18n issue for OpenStack
Joshua Harlow wrote:
> So there is a question here that I don’t understand.
>
> There a different levels of I18N, for say user facing error messages, or
> for other things I consider UI (horizon).
>
> Those need to be I18N and all that. I think the larger part that I don’t
> understand is why the things that are not the above (log messages) are
> being internationalized.
>
> So what level do we want to have ;) And what level is normal for people
> to expect (do systems like hadoop do I18N on there error messages, do
> other apache projects?)
I agree with you.
Documentation and user-facing interfaces should definitely support I18N.
That means Horizon, and (maybe) the Python client bindings.
Operators-facing log messages... not so much. By internationalizing them
we lose the ability to google for them, and I'm not convinced the
trade-off is favorable for that particular population.
If you come to the design summit and care about this, join us at the
"I18N in OpenStack" session.
Regards,
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
Release Manager, OpenStack
Follow ups
References