openstack team mailing list archive

[John Griffith <john.griffith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:36 PM, John Griffith
<john.griffith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Sam Morrison <sorrison@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I attempted to create a volume from an image in cinder and was getting
>> this strange error, turns out it was because I had my glance servers
>> specified as https://glanceserver:9292
>>
>> In cinder the version of images/glance.py is older than the one in nova
>> and is missing the ssl support additions.
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1089147
>>
>> My real question is why is there one version is nova and one version in
>> cinder. I also think there is quite a bit more unnecessary duplication.
>> Should it all go into oslo?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Sam
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
> Hi Sam,
>
> Short answer is "yes".  Need to check scoping etc and make sure that it
> does in fact fit within the parameters of OSLO.  It's something I thought
> of a couple weeks ago but to be honest it's been low on my list personally
> and nobody else that I know of has shown an interest in picking it up.
>
> You'll notice another image related item we're *borrowing* from Nova
> (cinder.image.image_utils).  In both cases there are slight modifications
> to fit Cinder's use case that given a bit of work could easily be shared.
>
> John
>

BTW, we can update to include the SSL changes your bug references right
away.  Long term, I'd like to go with the OSLO approach.

John