openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #22809
Re: which network controller is the best for quantum grizzly?
hmmm yeah it's a simple case. You can use the default one, the OVS
controller. It's good documented and works very well.
Greetings
On 18.04.2013 06:37, Liu Wenmao wrote:
> hi Heiko:
>
> My network topology is very simple: a router connecting with two
> subnets, each VM in the two subnets can ping each other.
>
> So it needs l3 layer routing, I also need namespace for quantum
> configuration. So is there a controller suitable for such a scenario?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Heiko Krämer <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Hi Wenmao,
>
> i think you should plan your network topologie first and after
> that you can decide which controller are the best choice for you.
>
> Greetings
> Heiko
>
>
> On 17.04.2013 14:01, Liu Wenmao wrote:
>> I have tried floodlight, but it does not support namespace, so I
>> wonder is there a better network controller to support
>> quantum?(nox, ryu ..)
>>
>> Wenmao Liu
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
References