← Back to team overview

openstack team mailing list archive

Re: which network controller is the best for quantum grizzly?

 

hmmm yeah it's a simple case. You can use the default one, the OVS
controller. It's good documented and works very well.

Greetings

On 18.04.2013 06:37, Liu Wenmao wrote:
> hi Heiko:
>
> My network topology is very simple: a router connecting with two
> subnets, each VM in the two subnets can ping each other.
>
> So it needs l3 layer routing, I also need namespace for quantum
> configuration. So is there a controller suitable for such a scenario?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Heiko Krämer <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Wenmao,
>
>     i think you should plan your network topologie first and after
>     that you can decide which controller are the best choice for you.
>
>     Greetings
>     Heiko
>
>
>     On 17.04.2013 14:01, Liu Wenmao wrote:
>>     I have tried floodlight, but it does not support namespace, so I
>>     wonder is there a better network controller to support
>>     quantum?(nox, ryu ..)
>>
>>     Wenmao Liu
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>>     Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>     Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>>     More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>     <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>     Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>     <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>     More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>


References