p2psp team mailing list archive
-
p2psp team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00199
Re: NAT traversal
Hi Vicente,
I struggled a bit with the virtual machines, as shared folders are
currently not working in VirtualBox on Linux, and some network
interfaces were listening to 2 ip addresses, even to one that was
assigned to another machine. Now networking with forwarding and
masquerading/port translation works fine, with full-cone and
port-restricted NAT.
Currently I am setting up UDP whole punching between the two machines,
which should work for these two NAT types.
Have a nice weekend,
Max
Am 27. Mai 2015 16:38:26 MESZ, schrieb Vicente Gonzalez
<vicente.gonzalez.ruiz@xxxxxxxxx>:
Hi Max.
Good ideas, go ahead!
Best,
Vi.
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:52 PM Max Mertens <max.mail@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:max.mail@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hi Vicente,
On 20.05.2015 23:38, Vicente Gonzalez wrote:
> Please, check also (although the text isn't very accurate):
>
>
http://www.ual.es/~vruiz/Investigacion/P2PSP/docs/main/WhitePaper/HTML/indexsu9.xht#x18-140004.9
<http://www.ual.es/%7Evruiz/Investigacion/P2PSP/docs/main/WhitePaper/HTML/indexsu9.xht#x18-140004.9>
>
<http://www.ual.es/%7Evruiz/Investigacion/P2PSP/docs/main/WhitePaper/HTML/indexsu9.xht#x18-140004.9>
>
> Regards,
> Vi.
Thanks. This gives a great overview over NAT difficulties and P2PSP
specialties (splitter server).
I have set up virtual machines (2 PCs, 2 routers) with host-only
virtual
network interfaces between them and iptables-based NATs.
Now I will try different NAT traversal techniques on different NAT
types/combinations, and gather the results in an overview.
Besides this,
I will try out traversing my home router as a real hardware example
(which seems to have Restricted Cone NAT) from university.
Regards,
Max
References