pbxt-discuss team mailing list archive
-
pbxt-discuss team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00125
Re: PBXT tarballs and recommended version
Second level caching, by the way, is something I am very excited to see! Correct me if I am wrong, but that is where the hybrid (SSD + Spinning Media) optimization is?
On Dec 17, 2010, at 2:50 AM, Paul McCullagh wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> 1.0 is the best tested, and is in production. I will post the latest tarball to Launchpad.
>
> 1.1 has some significant improvements in how it handles I/O. But it is not as widely used, so is recommended for production only after testing.
>
> In blogs and talks, I now usually refer to 1.5 and upwards because they have the cool features like 2nd-level caching and engine level replication.
>
> On Dec 16, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Brian Evans wrote:
>
>> I've been watching the development via LaunchPad as well as the blog.
>>
>> LaunchPad CHANGELOG shows 1.0.11-7 in September and 1.0.11-8 in November, but no tarballs are listed on the website.
>>
>> The blog and presentations talk about 1.1 but I cannot find a tarball for it.
>>
>> Currently, we have deployed 1.0.11-6 and it seems to be working well.
>> What is a recommended version for a production environment?
>> Is the 1.1 or 1.5 series "safe" for use at this time?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~pbxt-discuss
>> Post to : pbxt-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~pbxt-discuss
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~pbxt-discuss
> Post to : pbxt-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~pbxt-discuss
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
Follow ups
References