| Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
Hey folks! I just proposed my branch for merging.https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/quickly/extras/+merge/107104 <https://code.launchpad.net/%7Emterry/quickly/extras/+merge/107104>
I'd appreciate a code review by Tony or Didier so I can get this into trunk and then into an SRU. Also testing by folks in general would be good.
Now, this branch is focused exclusively on non-invasive changes to help with the SRU process. Specifically, that meant I only wanted to make changes to the --extras code path. So we add a lot of lines to debian/rules that could have been better done via upgrade.py changes to the user's code.
For 12.10, I think a follow-on goal to this branch is to stop polluting debian/rules and make the user's code more capable of being run from either /opt or /usr.
(Also note that this branch drops some old stuff we did for the ARB like the metadata in debian/control. Allison says it is no longer required as the MyApps portal does it for us.)
-mt On 23/05/12 15:41, Michael Terry wrote:
Sorry, I'm just now catching up to post-UDS quickly work. I've started a branch to fix the --extras command to match what the ARB wants.Thanks everyone for helping to fix these bugs. I'm sad we shipped 12.04 with them! Part of the problem was that we didn't have good test coverage of extras. My branch adds a new test for it. It's not done yet, but it's close.https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/quickly/extras -mt _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quickly-talk Post to : quickly-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quickly-talk More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
| Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
