registry team mailing list archive

1. registry team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the registry mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• [Bug 307220] Re: Error when tkgate starts simulator, (continued)
  • [Bug 307220] Re: Error when tkgate starts simulator
    From: David Erosa, 2010-05-17
  • [Bug 307220] Re: Error when tkgate starts simulator
    From: David Erosa, 2010-05-17
  • [Bug 307220] Re: Error when tkgate starts simulator
    From: Orion Lawlor, 2010-08-30
• [Bug 550100] Re: white noise or no sound after seeking when using PULSEAUDIO:default
  From: Jeff Sereno, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 550100] Re: white noise or no sound after seeking when using PULSEAUDIO:default
  From: Nico, 2010-06-08
• [Bug 550100] Re: white noise or no sound after seeking when using PULSEAUDIO:default
  From: Jeremy Nickurak, 2010-08-12
• [Bug 581429] Re: a perfect square is called "diamond"
  From: Christopher Hotchkiss, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 581429] Re: a perfect square is called "diamond"
  From: Jordi Mas, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 581429] Re: a perfect square is called "diamond"
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 581429] Re: a perfect square is called "diamond"
  From: lowje, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 581429] Re: a perfect square is called "diamond"
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-05-30
• [Bug 581429] Re: a perfect square is called "diamond"
  From: Jordi Mas, 2010-08-16
• [Bug 581429] Re: a perfect square is called "diamond"
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-09-16
• [Bug 138570] Re: Chess needs a "very easy" mode
  From: Valdisvi, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 138570] Re: Chess needs a "very easy" mode
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-09-16
• [Bug 294351] Re: some keyboard shortcuts in gedit are switched
  From: Uroš Gaber, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 574116] Re: Date::Manip changed in 10.04/Lucid
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 574116] Re: Date::Manip changed in 10.04/Lucid
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-06-19
• [Bug 574116] Re: Date::Manip changed in 10.04/Lucid
  From: Mario Limonciello, 2010-06-20
• [Bug 571097] Re: transmission-daemon overwrites settings.json symlink
  From: Krzysztof Klimonda, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 571097] Re: transmission-daemon overwrites settings.json symlink
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 571097] Re: transmission-daemon overwrites settings.json symlink
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 571097] Re: transmission-daemon overwrites settings.json symlink
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-05-17
• [Bug 571097] Re: transmission-daemon overwrites settings.json symlink
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-06-14
• [Bug 571097] Re: transmission-daemon overwrites settings.json symlink
  From: Martin Pitt, 2010-06-18
• [Bug 571097] Re: transmission-daemon overwrites settings.json symlink
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-06-18
• [Bug 571097] Re: transmission-daemon overwrites settings.json symlink
  From: Krzysztof Klimonda, 2010-06-19
• [Bug 571097] Re: transmission-daemon overwrites settings.json symlink
  From: Lacrocivious Acrophosist, 2010-06-19
• [Bug 571097] Re: transmission-daemon overwrites settings.json symlink
  From: Martin Pitt, 2010-06-20
• [Bug 571097] Re: transmission-daemon overwrites settings.json symlink
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-06-24
• [Bug 574116] Re: UnixDate broken in Date::Manip in 10.04/Lucid
  From: MarcRandolph, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
  From: Fred Fox, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
  From: Anton Kraus, 2010-06-10
• [Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
  From: Radu Cotescu, 2010-06-16
• [Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
  From: krishaqua, 2010-06-20
• [Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
  From: XabiX, 2010-06-21
• [Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
  From: Steve Atwell, 2010-09-09
• [Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
  From: Roopa Srinivas J, 2010-10-21
• [Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
  From: Roopa Srinivas J, 2010-10-22
• [Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
  From: Roopa Srinivas J, 2010-10-22
• [Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
  From: Roopa Srinivas J, 2010-10-22
• [Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
  From: Roopa Srinivas J, 2010-10-22
• [Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
  From: hallenrm, 2010-11-05
• [Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
  From: Guy Beslagic, 2010-11-07
• [Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
  From: Naty Bidart, 2010-11-14
• [Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
  From: Groening, 2010-12-05
• [Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
  From: XabiX, 2010-12-05
• [Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
  From: malheum, 2010-12-06
• [Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
  From: Hugh Saunders, 2010-12-14
• [Bug 576677] Re: [ubuntu-x-swat] fpit x-axis calibration faulty
  From: mgm, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 576677] Re: [ubuntu-x-swat] fpit x-axis calibration faulty
  From: Robert Hooker, 2010-05-26
• [Bug 565206] Re: Please update to 0.2.4 as it fixes compatibility issues with qt 4.6
  From: Fabrice Coutadeur, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 565206] Re: Please update to 0.2.4 as it fixes compatibility issues with qt 4.6
  From: Alex Valavanis, 2010-07-04
• [Bug 565206] Re: Please update to 0.2.4 as it fixes compatibility issues with qt 4.6
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-07-04
• [Bug 565206] Re: Please update to 0.2.4 as it fixes compatibility issues with qt 4.6
  From: Alex Valavanis, 2010-07-04
• [Bug 565206] Re: Please update to 0.2.4 as it fixes compatibility issues with qt 4.6
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-07-05
• [Bug 565206] Re: Please update to 0.2.4 as it fixes compatibility issues with qt 4.6
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-07-12
• [Bug 565206] Re: Please update to 0.2.4 as it fixes compatibility issues with qt 4.6
  From: Alex Valavanis, 2010-07-12
• [Bug 565206] Re: Please update to 0.2.4 as it fixes compatibility issues with qt 4.6
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-07-13
• [Bug 565206] Re: Please update to 0.2.4 as it fixes compatibility issues with qt 4.6
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-07-13
• [Bug 565206] Re: Please update to 0.2.4 as it fixes compatibility issues with qt 4.6
  From: Dominik, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 565206] Re: Please update to 0.2.4 as it fixes compatibility issues with qt 4.6
  From: Alex Valavanis, 2010-07-14
• [Bug 565206] Re: Please update to 0.2.4 as it fixes compatibility issues with qt 4.6
  From: Alex Valavanis, 2010-07-15
• [Bug 565206] Re: Please update to 0.2.4 as it fixes compatibility issues with qt 4.6
  From: Alex Valavanis, 2010-07-15
• [Bug 565206] Re: Please update to 0.2.4 as it fixes compatibility issues with qt 4.6
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-07-15
• [Bug 574058] Re: [needs-packaging] Anomos
  From: Fabrice Coutadeur, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 574058] Re: [needs-packaging] Anomos
  From: Lorenzo De Liso, 2010-06-21
• [Bug 571420] Re: [needs-packaging] Universal Applets
  From: Fabrice Coutadeur, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 399851] Re: [needs-packaging] fgrun, A flight gear launcher.
  From: Leonardo Torok, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 399851] Re: [needs-packaging] fgrun, A flight gear launcher.
  From: Simrun Basuita, 2010-06-23
• [Bug 399851] Re: [needs-packaging] fgrun, A flight gear launcher.
  From: Danny Stieben, 2010-12-19
• [Bug 399851] Re: [needs-packaging] fgrun, A flight gear launcher.
  From: Chris, 2010-12-19
• [Bug 384762] Re: rabbitmq-server has excessive dependencies
  From: gliptak, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 330833] Re: NetworkManager always overwrites default route when connecting to OpenVPN network
  From: raliegh, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 330833] Re: NetworkManager always overwrites default route when connecting to OpenVPN network
  From: raliegh, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 330833] Re: NetworkManager always overwrites default route when connecting to OpenVPN network
  From: Paweł Zuzelski, 2010-06-18
• [Bug 330833] Re: NetworkManager always overwrites default route when connecting to OpenVPN network
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-09-16
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: Diego D, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: David Tombs, 2010-05-17
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: Aaron Marburg, 2010-05-23
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: David Tombs, 2010-05-28
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: Stanley Chmiela, 2010-05-28
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: David Tombs, 2010-05-28
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: Stanley Chmiela, 2010-05-28
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: David Tombs, 2010-05-28
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: Stanley Chmiela, 2010-05-29
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: David Tombs, 2010-05-29
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-05-29
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: Charlie Kravetz, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: hivar, 2010-06-11
• Re: [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: Jeremy Nickurak, 2010-06-11
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: David Tombs, 2010-06-12
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: Jeremy Foshee, 2010-06-21
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: cosmix, 2010-08-13
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-09-16
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: Gyorgyi Toth, 2010-09-18
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: Gabriel Lindeborg, 2010-10-19
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: João Gomes, 2010-10-19
• Re: [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: Jeremy Nickurak, 2010-10-19
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: Gabriel Lindeborg, 2010-10-20
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: João Gomes, 2010-10-20
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: João Gomes, 2010-10-20
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: Gabriel Lindeborg, 2010-10-21
• [Bug 376793] Re: HP 2140 Lid Close Not Detected
  From: João Gomes, 2010-10-21
• [Bug 351293] Re: After installing, there is no desktop. Only a pale blue screen with arrow pointer.
  From: Charlie Kravetz, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 351293] Re: After installing, there is no desktop. Only a pale blue screen with arrow pointer.
  From: dusktrader, 2010-05-17
• [Bug 351293] Re: After installing, there is no desktop. Only a pale blue screen with arrow pointer.
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-07-06
• [Bug 351293] Re: After installing, there is no desktop. Only a pale blue screen with arrow pointer.
  From: Charlie Kravetz, 2010-07-21
• [Bug 542482] Re: Offer command to remove old incremental backups from target
  From: Olivier Berger, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 542482] Re: Offer command to remove old incremental backups from target
  From: Olivier Berger, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 542482] Re: Offer command to remove old incremental backups from target
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-07-25
• [Bug 542482] Re: Offer command to remove old incremental backups from target
  From: Olivier Berger, 2010-08-26
• [Bug 542482] Re: Offer command to remove old incremental backups from target
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-08-26
• [Bug 542482] Re: Offer command to remove old incremental backups from target
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-08-26
• [Bug 542482] Re: Offer command to remove old incremental backups from target
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-09-19
• [Bug 555870] Re: Gamma values are not being set properly after a second fade out resulting in a black screen
  From: Chris Coulson, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 555870] Re: Gamma values are not being set properly after a second fade out resulting in a black screen
  From: Stefan Pappalardo, 2010-06-20
• [Bug 555870] Re: Gamma values are not being set properly after a second fade out resulting in a black screen
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-09-16
• [Bug 555870] Re: Gamma values are not being set properly after a second fade out resulting in a black screen
  From: Maxim Levitsky, 2010-09-25
• [Bug 555870] Re: Gamma values are not being set properly after a second fade out resulting in a black screen
  From: Raphael Camus, 2010-10-24
• [Bug 555870] Re: Gamma values are not being set properly after a second fade out resulting in a black screen
  From: Raphael Camus, 2010-10-24
• [Bug 555870] Re: Gamma values are not being set properly after a second fade out resulting in a black screen
  From: MarcelD, 2010-11-25
• [Bug 555870] [NEW] Gamma values are not being set properly after a second fade out resulting in a black screen
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 377535] Re: kpackagekit doesn't show up changelogs
  From: Sebastian Heinlein, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 377535] Re: kpackagekit doesn't show up changelogs
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 377535] Re: kpackagekit doesn't show up changelogs
  From: Vistaus, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 377535] Re: kpackagekit doesn't show up changelogs
  From: Michael Vogt, 2010-05-17
• [Bug 377535] Re: kpackagekit doesn't show up changelogs
  From: Michael Vogt, 2010-05-17
• [Bug 377535] Re: kpackagekit doesn't show up changelogs
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-05-17
• [Bug 377535] Re: kpackagekit doesn't show up changelogs
  From: Colin Watson, 2010-05-19
• [Bug 377535] Re: kpackagekit doesn't show up changelogs
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-05-19
• [Bug 377535] Re: kpackagekit doesn't show up changelogs
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-05-19
• [Bug 377535] Re: kpackagekit doesn't show up changelogs
  From: Scott Kitterman, 2010-05-19
• [Bug 377535] Re: kpackagekit doesn't show up changelogs
  From: Jan Schneider, 2010-05-19
• Re: [Bug 377535] Re: kpackagekit doesn't show up changelogs
  From: Sebastian Heinlein, 2010-05-20
• [Bug 377535] Re: kpackagekit doesn't show up changelogs
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-05-20
• [Bug 377535] Re: kpackagekit doesn't show up changelogs
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-05-26
• [Bug 458334] Re: Fails repeatably with "DBus error org.gtk.Private.RemoteVolumeMonitor.NotFound: The given volume was not found"
  From: Greg Taylor, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 458334] Re: Fails repeatably with "DBus error org.gtk.Private.RemoteVolumeMonitor.NotFound: The given volume was not found"
  From: David Seal, 2010-05-18
• [Bug 458334] Re: Fails repeatably with "DBus error org.gtk.Private.RemoteVolumeMonitor.NotFound: The given volume was not found"
  From: yj92fromnj, 2010-05-19
• [Bug 458334] Re: Fails repeatably with "DBus error org.gtk.Private.RemoteVolumeMonitor.NotFound: The given volume was not found"
  From: Yuri, 2010-05-29
• [Bug 458334] Re: Fails repeatably with "DBus error org.gtk.Private.RemoteVolumeMonitor.NotFound: The given volume was not found"
  From: David Tombs, 2010-06-20
• [Bug 458334] Re: Fails repeatably with "DBus error org.gtk.Private.RemoteVolumeMonitor.NotFound: The given volume was not found"
  From: David Tombs, 2010-06-20
• [Bug 458334] Re: Fails repeatably with "DBus error org.gtk.Private.RemoteVolumeMonitor.NotFound: The given volume was not found"
  From: nandayo, 2010-08-10
• [Bug 458334] Re: Fails repeatably with "DBus error org.gtk.Private.RemoteVolumeMonitor.NotFound: The given volume was not found"
  From: Mikko Ohtamaa, 2010-09-12
• [Bug 458334] Re: Fails repeatably with "DBus error org.gtk.Private.RemoteVolumeMonitor.NotFound: The given volume was not found"
  From: David Tombs, 2010-09-12
• [Bug 458334] Re: Fails repeatably with "DBus error org.gtk.Private.RemoteVolumeMonitor.NotFound: The given volume was not found"
  From: ismail azzam, 2010-10-14
• Re: [Bug 458334] Re: Fails repeatably with "DBus error org.gtk.Private.RemoteVolumeMonitor.NotFound: The given volume was not found"
  From: Matt Zimmerman, 2010-10-14
• [Bug 581291] Re: upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
  From: Scott James Remnant, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 581291] Re: upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
  From: Mike Bianchi, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 581291] Re: upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
  From: Mike Bianchi, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 581291] Re: upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
  From: Mike Bianchi, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 581291] Re: upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
  From: Mike Bianchi, 2010-05-17
• [Bug 581291] Re: upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
  From: Scott James Remnant, 2010-05-17
• [Bug 581291] Re: upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
  From: Scott James Remnant, 2010-05-17
• [Bug 581291] Re: upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
  From: Mike Bianchi, 2010-05-17
• [Bug 581291] Re: upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
  From: Scott James Remnant, 2010-05-17
• [Bug 581291] Re: upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
  From: Mike Bianchi, 2010-05-17
• [Bug 581291] Re: upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
  From: Mike Bianchi, 2010-05-17
• [Bug 581291] Re: upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
  From: Mike Bianchi, 2010-05-17
• [Bug 581291] Re: upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
  From: Mike Bianchi, 2010-05-17
• [Bug 581291] Re: upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
  From: Mike Bianchi, 2010-05-17
• Re: [Bug 581291] Re: upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
  From: Scott James Remnant, 2010-05-17
• [Bug 581291] Re: upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
  From: Mike Bianchi, 2010-05-17
• [Bug 581291] Re: upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
  From: Mike Bianchi, 2010-05-17
• [Bug 581291] Re: upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
  From: Till Kamppeter, 2010-06-21
• [Bug 581291] [NEW] upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 364319] Re: pstoedit cannot convert to SVG any more
  From: Tillmo, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 364319] Re: pstoedit cannot convert to SVG any more
  From: Marcel Stimberg, 2010-08-23
• [Bug 364319] Re: pstoedit cannot convert to SVG any more
  From: Nikolai G. Lehtinen, 2010-08-30
• [Bug 364319] Re: pstoedit cannot convert to SVG any more
  From: Marcel Stimberg, 2010-09-02
• [Bug 9054] Re: gedit does not read from a pipe
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 9054] Re: gedit does not read from a pipe
  From: Chris Coulson, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 9054] Re: gedit does not read from a pipe
  From: beej, 2010-05-17
• [Bug 9054] Re: gedit does not read from a pipe
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-09-16
• [Bug 519787] Re: mpd: segfault when trying to play a m4a (AAC-LC) file
  From: chilicuil, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 519787] Re: mpd: segfault when trying to play a m4a (AAC-LC) file
  From: chilicuil, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 519787] Re: mpd: segfault when trying to play a m4a (AAC-LC) file
  From: chilicuil, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 519787] Re: mpd: segfault when trying to play a m4a (AAC-LC) file
  From: chilicuil, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 519787] Re: mpd: segfault when trying to play a m4a (AAC-LC) file
  From: chilicuil, 2010-05-17
• [Bug 519787] Re: mpd: segfault when trying to play a m4a (AAC-LC) file
  From: Fabrice Coutadeur, 2010-05-25
• [Bug 519787] Re: mpd: segfault when trying to play a m4a (AAC-LC) file
  From: Brian Murray, 2010-05-25
• [Bug 519787] Re: mpd: segfault when trying to play a m4a (AAC-LC) file
  From: chilicuil, 2010-05-25
• [Bug 519787] Re: mpd: segfault when trying to play a m4a (AAC-LC) file
  From: Fabrice Coutadeur, 2010-05-26
• [Bug 519787] Re: mpd: segfault when trying to play a m4a (AAC-LC) file
  From: chilicuil, 2010-05-26
• [Bug 519787] Re: mpd: segfault when trying to play a m4a (AAC-LC) file
  From: Fabrice Coutadeur, 2010-07-15
• [Bug 519787] Re: mpd: segfault when trying to play a m4a (AAC-LC) file
  From: Fabrice Coutadeur, 2010-07-15
• [Bug 79610] Re: Gnome Network Monitor panel applet doesn't have properly transparent background
  From: Aliaksandr Dzeshchanka, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 79610] Re: Gnome Network Monitor panel applet doesn't have properly transparent background
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-09-16
• [Bug 381140] Re: jpegtran is NOT lossless with metadata (Exif data, etc.) by default
  From: Mechanical snail, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 549493] Re: package hylafax-client 2:6.0.3-5.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: cp: `/etc/hylafax/pagesizes' and `/var/spool/hylafax/etc/pagesizes' are the same file
  From: Bhavani Shankar, 2010-05-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 549493] Re: package hylafax-client 2:6.0.3-5.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: cp: `/etc/hylafax/pagesizes' and `/var/spool/hylafax/etc/pagesizes' are the same file
  From: Fabrice Coutadeur, 2010-05-16
• [Bug 549493] Re: package hylafax-client 2:6.0.3-5.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: cp: `/etc/hylafax/pagesizes' and `/var/spool/hylafax/etc/pagesizes' are the same file
  From: Jean-Baptiste Lallement, 2010-06-09
• [Bug 549493] Re: package hylafax-client 2:6.0.3-5.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: cp: `/etc/hylafax/pagesizes' and `/var/spool/hylafax/etc/pagesizes' are the same file
  From: Bhavani Shankar, 2010-06-09
• [Bug 549493] Re: package hylafax-client 2:6.0.3-5.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: cp: `/etc/hylafax/pagesizes' and `/var/spool/hylafax/etc/pagesizes' are the same file
  From: Bhavani Shankar, 2010-06-10
• [Bug 549493] Re: package hylafax-client 2:6.0.3-5.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: cp: `/etc/hylafax/pagesizes' and `/var/spool/hylafax/etc/pagesizes' are the same file
  From: David Futcher, 2010-06-11
• [Bug 549493] Re: package hylafax-client 2:6.0.3-5.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: cp: `/etc/hylafax/pagesizes' and `/var/spool/hylafax/etc/pagesizes' are the same file
  From: Bhavani Shankar, 2010-06-25
• [Bug 549493] Re: package hylafax-client 2:6.0.3-5.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: cp: `/etc/hylafax/pagesizes' and `/var/spool/hylafax/etc/pagesizes' are the same file
  From: Antonio J. de Oliveira, 2010-09-17
• [Bug 549493] Re: package hylafax-client 2:6.0.3-5.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: cp: `/etc/hylafax/pagesizes' and `/var/spool/hylafax/etc/pagesizes' are the same file
  From: Bhavani Shankar, 2010-09-17
• [Bug 549493] Re: package hylafax-client 2:6.0.3-5.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: cp: `/etc/hylafax/pagesizes' and `/var/spool/hylafax/etc/pagesizes' are the same file
  From: Antonio J. de Oliveira, 2010-09-17

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2021 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Data privacy  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  Blog  •  Careers  •  System status