subunit-dev team mailing list archive
-
subunit-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00023
Re: timing data, the time stamp facility and test activity granularity
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Robert
Collins<robertc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 09:55 +1000, Jonathan Lange wrote:
>
>> Hey Rob,
>>
>> It's been quite some time since you sent this email out, and you seem
>> to have done a lot of timing-related work to bzr. Did you come to any
>> conclusions about this design?
>>
>> jml
>
> I think its going to fit somewhere in the gap between
> tests take care of testing
> results take care of reporting
>
> - in a model of tests being a black box what things do what is internal.
> - we need some opaque-structured way to expose things that tests do
> (structured additional data)
>
I think this is a good analysis.
> Having that structured data be taggable in the same way that the
> outermost stream is would allow a convention for reporting that may work
> well, and allow TestResources and other similar things to collaborate.
Sounds good to me.
jml
Follow ups
References