← Back to team overview

subunit-dev team mailing list archive

Re: timing data, the time stamp facility and test activity granularity

 

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Robert
Collins<robertc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 09:55 +1000, Jonathan Lange wrote:
>
>> Hey Rob,
>>
>> It's been quite some time since you sent this email out, and you seem
>> to have done a lot of timing-related work to bzr. Did you come to any
>> conclusions about this design?
>>
>> jml
>
> I think its going to fit somewhere in the gap between
> tests take care of testing
> results take care of reporting
>
> - in a model of tests being a black box what things do what is internal.
> - we need some opaque-structured way to expose things that tests do
> (structured additional data)
>

I think this is a good analysis.

> Having that structured data be taggable in the same way that the
> outermost stream is would allow a convention for reporting that may work
> well, and allow TestResources and other similar things to collaborate.

Sounds good to me.

jml



Follow ups

References