torios team mailing list archive

["Ali/amjjawad" <amjjawad@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Samuel,

Further to my previous email:
https://lists.launchpad.net/torios/msg02198.html

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Samuel Klein <srukle@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> I want to remind ToriOS that GitHub is still a viable option. The project
> can be hosted on this webserver (besides the ISO). But we could use other
> servers besides an FTP server for the ISO.
>
> Pros:
> 1. Can use custom domain like torios.net
> 2. Reliable server
> 3. Git commits for transparency
> 4. Blog/Wiki support
>
> Organization:
> https://github.com/Tori-OS
>
> Website:
> tori-os.github.io <https://github.com/Tori-OS/tori-os.github.io>
>

Will the URL of the project be:
http://tori-os.github.io/

Or it can be something like: torios.something only?

Example:
ToriOS Project website: torios.top

I must be very clear here: the website of the project must show the domain
name of the ToriOS only, without anything else.

This is very important.



>
> Sam Klein
>


Thank you!

P.S.
I liked the design of that demo website you shared. What Platform is that?!
Are you skilled enough to use it? I mean, build something similar?

If yes, how long that will take?!


*Sent:* Wednesday, January 06, 2016 at 4:06 PM
> *From:* Israel <israeldahl@xxxxxxxxx>
> *To:* torios@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: [Torios] The History of ToriOS Websites
> On 01/06/2016 02:28 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
> > ..
> I agree with Nio's assesment.
>
> We should all try to be very clear with each other, it is often hard to
> fully express ourselves via faceless text. :)
> > @ all other toriosadores, ToriOS needs input from more people in this
> > discussion in order to find a solution that is good enough. Please
> > tell us what *you* think :-) Best regards Nio
> Hey all,
> I am willing to contribute financially as well, I currently do not have
> much to add but I think between Nio and I we could split the yearly
> cost, until we received more support or others chime in.
>
> I have been extremely busy recently, and have not had the time to do
> much. I have been working on rebasing for trusty, the main issue I face
> there is the increased size of the dependencies. Many things now
> require things we do not use/want/need, such as NetworkManager. This
> requires a lot more dependencies (initial systemd stuff that was
> introduced in 14.04) It will take a while to get a decent sized CD out
> of this, as OBI requires a tarball... perhaps we could offer a separate
> solution where we have a CD image that requires a separate download of
> the tarball... though I will continue to look through things and see
> where I can cut corners (in size not quality of course).
> The best I have gotten so far is around 800MiB This is too much for a
> CD, and does not include Seamonkey in any form (live or installed). I
> might be able to shirnk it more (removing things like synaptic?
> possibly using my battery monitor (very small gtk program) instead of
> the XFCE power manager)
> I still need to test things more but the space issue is the largest. We
> fixed nearly everything with OBI in our previous testing and have made
> it much more robust.
> I do wish there was a smaller network manager that did not require all
> the gnome stuff, and worked as well (including native icon theme
> support), but I haven't found one yet.
>
> --
> Regards
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~torios
> Post to : torios@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~torios
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~torios
> Post to     : torios@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~torios
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>


-- 
Remember: "All of us are smarter than any one of us."

Best Regards,
Ali/amjjawad <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/amjjawad>

*http://kibo.computer <http://kibo.computer>* - http://torios.net - Ubuntu
GNOME <http://ubuntugnome.org/>