ubuntu-appstore-developers team mailing list archive

[Martin Albisetti <martin.albisetti@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:57 PM, James Tait <james.tait@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/06/13 16:36, Martin Albisetti wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 9:40 PM, James Tait
>> <james.tait@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> click_version: string (searchable, retrievable) # '0.1'
>>> click_framework: string (searchable, retrievable) #
>>> 'ubuntu-sdk-13.10' click_updown_url: url (retrievable)
>>> countries_to_distribute: string (searchable, multi-value)
>>
>>
>> So, I realised that we may want to also have "SDK version", which
>> is really what the client can use to figure out what's installable
>> or not.
>
> Separate from click_framework?  I probably don't really know enough
> about the specifics of the client, but I'd imagine they'd be aware of
> what frameworks they support.

I think it's different. Think. Maybe Colin or Stuart can comment on it.
I would guess that the click package framework itself would have
different versioning than the SDK. I have been conflating them as the
same, but maybe they're not.


> This does raise a couple of interesting questions though, which I
> forgot in my previous mail - will Click packages target a single SDK
> and version, or will they be able to support multiple versions of
> multiple SDKs?  What about the clients?
>
> If packages can target multiple (SDK, version) combinations, we should
> make click_framework multiValued. If clients can support multiple
> frameworks, they can issue a query along the lines of
> "q=click_framework(ubuntu-sdk-13.10 OR ubuntu-sdk-14.04)".

Great question for Colin  :)


--
Martin