ubuntu-appstore-developers team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-appstore-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00287
Re: Adding "applications" to manifest file
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:01:19PM -0700, Steve Beattie wrote:
> Upon reflection, one thing I noticed that apparmor and other system
> hooks would lose from direct access to the manifest would be the
> contents of the Framework; field. I'm not sure how significant of a
> loss this is... for apparmor, we do encode a policy version field in
> the security structure in an attempt to cope with future iterations
> of templates, course-grained permissions, etc. and still have older
> applications/versions install and work unchanged.
You can still do this if you need to. Find the base unpack directory
using the algorithm in my previous e-mail (or a suitable click command
once one exists); then read $BASE/.click/info/$PACKAGE.manifest.
My gut feel is that needing the full manifest will be fairly rare. If
it turns out not to be, I can add a helper to print it given a path
within an unpacked package, which should solve this problem.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx]
References
-
Adding "applications" to manifest file
From: Ted Gould, 2013-07-12
-
Re: Adding "applications" to manifest file
From: Colin Watson, 2013-07-12
-
Re: Adding "applications" to manifest file
From: Ted Gould, 2013-07-12
-
Re: Adding "applications" to manifest file
From: Colin Watson, 2013-07-12
-
Re: Adding "applications" to manifest file
From: Steve Beattie, 2013-07-16
-
Re: Adding "applications" to manifest file
From: Colin Watson, 2013-07-17
-
Re: Adding "applications" to manifest file
From: Jamie Strandboge, 2013-07-17
-
Re: Adding "applications" to manifest file
From: Colin Watson, 2013-07-17
-
Re: Adding "applications" to manifest file
From: Steve Beattie, 2013-07-17
-
Re: Adding "applications" to manifest file
From: Steve Beattie, 2013-07-18