ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive

[C de-Avillez <hggdh2@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 12:29 -0500, Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo wrote:

(...)

> 5) List:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/160426
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/heartbeat/+bug/332043
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/heartbeat/+bug/369124
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/drbd8/+bug/371829
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvpn/+bug/372358
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irssi/+bug/372411
> 

Thank you. There are three points I think I should make: 

1. the only two differences between the ubuntu-bugsquad and
ubuntu-bugcontrol groups are the ability to:
* mark bugs as triaged, and 
* set their importance.

Unfortunately, you did not state how you would set the importance for
any of the bugs above.

2. It is uncommon to assign bugs to persons/groups while they are not
yet confirmed(and even when they are!) -- this is taken to mean that
someone is actively working on the bugs, and it is widely regarded as a
"I do not need to go there". Perhaps it would be better to leave them
unassigned, and just add the group as an automatic subscription to the
packages that deal with HA.

3. Good work on the first two bugs; unfortunately, bugs 371829, 372358,
and 372411 are not bugs, but workflow issues. As such, they do not
provide any data on how experienced you are with bug triaging.

Given points (1) and (3) above, I am afraid I cannot give you a positive
vote right now. I do hope, nevertheless, that you will resubmit/respond
with five bugs you have worked on, and their proposed importance.

(...)

> Thanks for considering me. Should you have any doubts, please contact
> me.

Thank you for helping, and I do hope you will provide the missing data.

-1 (hopefully, just for now ;-).

Cheers,

..hggdh..

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part