Hi there, Alberto!
One of the things you'll need is patience, we're all busy
working on bugs and such in preparation for the release of
Raring later this month.
I have a couple of concerns of the bugs you've selected to
display as examples of your work.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella
<es20490446e@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:es20490446e@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
El 22/03/13 05:52, Alberto Salvia Novella escribió:
Here is my application:
1. Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if
they are rude to you or Ubuntu? Have you signed the
Ubuntu Code of Conduct?
Yes, I promise: I signed Ubuntu Code of Conduct
years ago, and read it recently.
2. Have you read Bugs/HowToTriage
<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage>,
Bugs/Assignment
<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Assignment>, Bugs/Status
<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status> and
Bugs/Importance
<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance>? Do you have
any questions about that documentation?
I have been an active member of Launchpad since
2007 and, since then, the only operating system I
have used in my computers has been Ubuntu. In this
period I read these wiki-pages many times, and from
start to end before writing this application.
3. What sensitive data should you look for in a private
Apport crash report bug before making it public? See
Bugs/HowToTriage
<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage> for more
information.
- I should look for "CoreDump.gz" and remove it if
the stack trace provides enough details.
- I should check into "Stacktrace.txt" and
"ThreadStacktrace.txt" for any sensitive
information like passwords, bank account numbers,
CSS keys, user names or server names.
4. Is there a particular package or group of packages
that you are interested in helping out with?
There isn't. My objective is Ubuntu to be perceived
stable as a hole, by working on bugs that are more
obvious and making them to be triaged as fast as
possible.
5. Please list five or more bug reports which you have
triaged and include an explanation of your decisions.
Please note that these bugs should be representative of
your very best work and they should demonstrate your
understanding of the triage process and how to properly
handle bugs. For *all* the bugs in the list, please
indicate what importance you would give it *and*
explain the reasoning. /Please use urls in your list of
bugs./
Bandwidth limit is not correctly enforced:
Transmission delays are inserted between data chunk
writes (of arbitrary sizes)
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntuone-storage-protocol/+bug/720707>
- I change the hole bug description to be as clear
as possible. Also the original one didn't have
proper steps to reproduce it.
- I deeply investigated the origin of the bug and
how to workaround it. I provided the tools to test
it by the users themselves.
- I would give it an importance of "high", since it
has a moderate impact on a large portion of Ubuntu
users.
This above bug here isn't in the Ubuntu project itself, and
unless I'm mistaken is outside the scope of bug control.
(ubuntuone-storage-protocol project is not the same as the
Ubuntu project and packages.)
Misinformation when intending to download the
64-bit edition
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-website-content/+bug/585940>
- I completely rewrote the hole bug, since it
didn't reflect the scope of the hole long
discussion hold.
- I would give it an importance of "low", since
it's usability issue that does not limit the
functionality of Ubuntu but rather creates a
probable non-ideal configurations scenario.
The above bug ALSO isn't in the Ubuntu project itself, and
unless I'm mistaken is outside the scope of bug control.
(ubuntu-website-content project is not the same as the
Ubuntu project and packages.)
Unable to upgrade "commercial/binary-i386/Packages"
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1072705>
- I change the hole bug description to be as clear
as possible.
- I asked the user to add the missing log files as
separate attachments, in order to have them
automatically available. Also marked the bug as
incomplete.
- Also asked to gather information using apport,
since it was missed.
- I would give it an importance of "low", since the
program itself suggest the origin of the problem is
a misconfiguration.
upgrade issues 12.04=>12.10
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1100189>
- I transformed this but to a question, since the
user made a cross-dependency issue himself by using
an experimental ppa for xorg. So it wasn't a bug
but a support request.
- Since it is not longer a bug, its importance
cannot be set. However is would give it an
importance of "low", since it's hoped the user to
be the only one affected.
When selected partition is not focused, it becomes
invisible
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/1079196>
- I attached an screen-cast which clearly showed
the problem, but now I think screen-casts are
useless when the bug description is clear.
- I would give it an importance of "low", since
it's an usability issue that does not limit the
functionality of the application.
- I assigned the bug to the "Paper Cuts Ninja"
project, since of its low importance in a
application provided in the default installation.
Or have a look at any other bug from the bunch I have
here <https://bugs.launchpad.net/%7Ees20490446e>,
although they aren't the most impressive in the world.
But happy birthday to me: I recently got my
twenty-fives and also got at the same time my hundred
bugs worked in. And if you notice any errata in this
application there will be no problem in asking me to
improve it.
Regards,
Alberto Salvia Novella (es20490446e)
<https://launchpad.net/%7Ees20490446e>
El 08/01/13 15:10, C de-Avillez escribió:
On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 00:36:30 Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
Please, accept me to join Ubuntu BugSquad and BugControl in Launchpad
and I will show you what Raring is going to be. If you need more info
about me and how familiar I am with the triaging process, you can have a
look at my profile in Launchpad<https://launchpad.net/%7Ees20490446e> <https://launchpad.net/%7Ees20490446e>.
My fault there regarding the Ubuntu-BugSquad. I have added you in (and
processed all other pending requests).
For Ubuntu BugControl the process is different. You must show you understand
how we use status and importance, and you must show bugs you triaged. This
process is explained in [1].
Cheers,
..C..
[1]https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl
So?
--
Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list
Ubuntu-bugsquad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:Ubuntu-bugsquad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugsquad
Do you have any other specific selections of bugs you would
like to showcase?
(as well, bugsquad does not need to receive the application
emails, so please do not include the bugsquad mailing list
in your "To" or "Cc" fields)
------
Thomas
