ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive

[Alberto Salvia Novella <es20490446e@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry because of the delay. Here are the answers:

After selecting to view hidden and backup files, they aren't shown until the window is closed  <https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/1161412>

 * I considered the first thing the user will do is to close the window
   and reopen it, so the bug will be easily workarounded for him.


xSPIM application does not start  <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spim/+bug/824084>

 * I changed the "doesn't work in any case" statement to "doesn't work
   with all the Ubuntu releases".
 * I clarified the workaround to not be working in Ubuntu 13.04.
 * Philip Wyett <https://launchpad.net/%7Ephilip-wyett> filed the bug
   to debbugs #670949
   <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670949> on 2013-04-11.


El 12/04/13 01:59, Brian Murray escribió:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 06:45:07PM +0200, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> > Dear Thomas,
> >
> > About these two bugs that were not valid in my application for
> > joining the Ubuntu BugControl team, I found two great substitutes:
> >
> >     After selecting to view hidden and backup files, they aren't shown
> >     until the window is closed
> >     <https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/1161412>
> >
> >         - I reported the bug myself, with rich detail.
> >         - I forwarded it upstream.
> >         - I would give it an importance of "low", since it's an
> >         usability issue that does not limit the functionality of the
> >         application.
> While using your own bug reports in applications to the Ubuntu Bug
> Control team is generally frowned upon the work of forwarding the bug is
> the same and the forward (and bug watch) look good.  I think I would
> give this an importance of at least Medium though as it makes it hard to
> find these files.
>
> >     xSPIM application does not start
> >     <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spim/+bug/824084>
> >
> >         - I explained how this package dependencies where not correctly met.
> >         - I confirmed the bug was still there many releases after.
> >         - I tagged all the affected releases.
> >         - I reported the bug was still there and not as imagined by
> >         other user.
> >         - I added a work-around.
> What does "doesn't work in any case" mean there?
>
> >         - I would give it an importance of "high", since prevents the
> >         application from functioning at all and the work-around won't
> >         always on any Ubuntu release.
> Could you clarify in which releases the workaround works in the bug?
>
> This looks good but looking in Debian for the bug report and adding a
> bug watch for it would have helped too.
>
> --
> Brian Murray
> Ubuntu Bug Master

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: Firma criptográfica S/MIME