← Back to team overview

ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive

Re: new bug supervisor, ~cmiller?

 

I'm generally +1 as well since I've also worked with Chad before, but Chad
can you please list the severity you would assign the rest of those issues
and why?


On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Chad Miller <chad.miller@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Hi.  I want to manage some bugs.
>
> Following instructions at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl ...
>
>
>
>> Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they are rude to you
>> or Ubuntu? Have you signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct?
>>
>
> I agree.  Signed CoC eight years ago.
>
>
>> Have you read Bugs/HowToTriage, Bugs/Assignment, Bugs/Status and
>> Bugs/Importance? Do you have any questions about that documentation?
>>
>
> Have read. Have no questions.
>
>
>> What sensitive data should you look for in a private Apport crash report
>> bug before making it public? See Bugs/HowToTriage for more information.
>>
>
> Hostnames, anything personally identifiable, authentication information,
> generally any leak of information owned by the reporter or specific to them.
>
>
>> Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are
>> interested in helping out with?
>>
>
> Packages in Desktop team's purview.  Most specifically, chromium-browser .
>
>
>> Please list five or more bug reports which you have triaged and include
>> an explanation of your decisions. Please note that these bugs should be
>> representative of your very best work and they should demonstrate your
>> understanding of the triage process and how to properly handle bugs. For
>> all the bugs in the list, please indicate what importance you would give it
>> and explain the reasoning. Please use urls in your list of bugs.
>
>
>
> Bugs I would change or just did change:
>
>    1.
>    https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/902747
>    Already set title to have most meaningful stackframe, not abort or
>    logging, but cause.  Would also set "Triaged/Low", as there's not a lot to
>    do about running out of memory on startup other than fail in a more
>    descriptive way, and it's not a normal case that affects a lot of people.
>    2.
>    https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1226618
>    Set to incomplete, as the reporter may have Alternatives that is not
>    what he expects.
>    3.
>    https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/1229065
>    Flash crash isn't obviously a chromium bug.
>    4.
>    https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1225215
>    My own bug report. I'd mark "Triaged/Medium"
>    5.
>    https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/1228417
>    Reassigned flash bug.  Can't mark as Dup as I can't see its stack.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol
> Post to     : ubuntu-bugcontrol@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>

Follow ups

References