ubuntu-defect-analysts team mailing list archive

[Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/15/2011 06:38 AM, Pedro Villavicencio wrote:
> Hello,
>
> El 14/11/11 17:14, Kate Stewart escribió:
> > Ursula, Pedro, Joseph, Jose,
> > I'm doing a pass through the escalated and "needs to be" escalated
> > bugs right now, and want to make sure there are no others from the
> > defect analysts that should be considered. Here's what I have so far
> > from the defect analysts needs. (thanks Brian!). Anything other bugs
> > on each of your top "need a fix to this launchpad bug to make my life a
> > bit more sane list?" or does the list Brian provided hit your top ones
> > as well?
>
> The list provided by Brian does represent my concerns too, I'm
> particular interesting on the last two there: LP: #29713 and LP: #878532.
>
> Thanks!,
>
> pedro.
> > Currently escalated bugs, and those that are being considered to be
> > escalated can be found here:
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Launchpad/Stakeholder/UbuntuEngineering
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kate
I'm still getting up to speed with the good and bad of Launchpad, so I 
don't have any top bugs as of yet.

However, one thing I noticed is Launchpad does not provide the option to 
search for tags using wild cards.  There are ways around this using the 
Launchpad API.  However, it would be nice to be able to use wild cards.

When a kernel bug is fixed upstream, we mark it with a tag like: 
'kernel-fixed-upstream-KERNEL-VERSION'.  For example, if kernel version 
3.2-rc1 fixed a bug, the tag would be: 'kernel-fixed-upstream-v3.2-rc1'. 
 However, another bug might be fixed by 3.2-rc2, so the tag would be 
'kernel-fixed-upstream-v3.2-rc2'.  It would be great if we could search 
bugs with tags 'kernel-fixed-upstream-v3.2*' or 
'kernel-fixed-upstream-v3.1*'

Do you all consider the lack of wild cards a bug?  If so, I will open one.

Thanks,

Joe