On 21/01/14 17:03, Erick Brunzell
wrote:
On 01/18/2014 12:11 AM, Ali Linx
(amjjawad) wrote:
What are we waiting for exactly? we should be testing the images
already
Upon seeing nothing yet I decided to probe a bit further.
Specifically I also need to test Edubuntu upgrades, both from
Precise and Saucy since their Precise was a 5 year LTS, and I
noticed that the upgrade test dates were wrong so I filed a bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-qa-website/+bug/1271020
Of course that doesn't directly effect us because Tim wisely
included the upgrade tests in our iso-testing category :^)
But I'm honestly wondering if we don't need to make the first move
when it comes to triggering this "opt-in" testing?
I'm personally conflicted as to whether or not we need to "opt-in"
or "opt-out" of each possible "opt-in" pre-release test, but I
think with the recent addition of 'gnome-shell' 3.10 we'd be wise
to push some testing for an Alpha 2. Does Tim agree?
You can assume we are "opt-in" to all alpha/beta releases unless Ali
says otherwise.
As far as I am concerned I want to see bugs reports! not people
asking if they should be testing ;)
Sorry to be a pain in the neck,
Lance
|