On 01/21/2014 12:14 AM, Tim wrote:
On 21/01/14 17:03, Erick Brunzell
wrote:
On 01/18/2014 12:11 AM, Ali Linx
(amjjawad) wrote:
What are we waiting for exactly? we should be testing the images
already
I'm waiting for Alpha 2 testing to appear on the iso-tracker:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/
Should I just start on the daily's and assume the results will count
towards Alpha 2?
Upon seeing nothing yet I decided to probe a bit further.
Specifically I also need to test Edubuntu upgrades, both from
Precise and Saucy since their Precise was a 5 year LTS, and I
noticed that the upgrade test dates were wrong so I filed a bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-qa-website/+bug/1271020
Of course that doesn't directly effect us because Tim wisely
included the upgrade tests in our iso-testing category :^)
But I'm honestly wondering if we don't need to make the first
move when it comes to triggering this "opt-in" testing?
I'm personally conflicted as to whether or not we need to
"opt-in" or "opt-out" of each possible "opt-in" pre-release
test, but I think with the recent addition of 'gnome-shell' 3.10
we'd be wise to push some testing for an Alpha 2. Does Tim
agree?
You can assume we are "opt-in" to all alpha/beta releases unless
Ali says otherwise.
As far as I am concerned I want to see bugs reports! not people
asking if they should be testing ;)
You know I've been a reliable tester and bug reporter, and I'll
continue to do so :^)
Sorry to be a pain in the neck,
Lance
I'll just start testing and report any problems here as well as the
iso-tracker.
The beauty of having actual Alpha's and Beta's is providing a proper
platform for new testers to "jump in" at the proper point.
Lance
|