ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-phone team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03804
Re: Tab widget design
-
To:
ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
Jamie Strandboge <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:26:16 -0500
-
In-reply-to:
<CANySw1n=usQN9=6jAEAgCTRZ7357oNEg=7Xizr5XkM2tZAkNjg@mail.gmail.com>
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8
On 08/16/2013 08:51 AM, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> It was already my intention to get in touch about this to see what's
> the general feeling, and after seeing Michael Hall's post about the
> use of the tab widget for indicators as well (http://goo.gl/yJP7Ns),
> this sounds like a good timing.
>
> After experimenting with the phone interface for the last few days,
> the swiping-tabs interface stands out as being perhaps the only
> component that is somewhat awkward to use. The widget hides the full
> list of options in the tab behind reasonable thumb-exercising, at a
> position which is not comfortable to reach, let alone swiping
> repeatedly. Then, if you don't actually select anything because you
> didn't find what was being searched for, the widget remains in that
> misaligned position.
>
> I won't provide any suggestions as we have some fantastic people
> taking care of it, but just in terms of being a user of it, it would
> be nice to have something that uses more of the screen state to
> display what are the possible options, and so that we can reach them
> with less swiping, in a lower screen position.
>
> Is it just me, or is that a shared feeling?
>
I recently noticed the misaligned position. I agree that discoverability of the
tabs is not obvious, but it is also something that once you learn isn't bad. I
think there is probably a limit to the number of usable tabs though-- too many
is a lot of swiping. I didn't think about the fact that I had to reach over with
my finger to swipe until now. I also am not offering any suggestions...
--
Jamie Strandboge http://www.ubuntu.com/
Follow ups
References