ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: Landing team 16.01.14
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:02:39AM +0100, f69m wrote:
> >If libqubuntu.so is still needed for SF, even on Mir-based devices, perhaps
> >qtubuntu-desktop should be added to the seed. Or perhaps now's the right
> >moment to get rid of SF once and for all?
> For us porters it would be nice to have at least one image with SF
> working as an important step before even thinking of tackling mir.
I think SF is a crutch that at this point isn't actually helping porters
with bootstrapping of Ubuntu Touch. Mir is better supported, and the
integration requirements for Mir vs. SF are largely the same -
so I don't see any reason that it makes sense for porters to bring up SF,
which has a lot more Android baggage to get in the way, instead of going
straight for Mir.
> Just got Ubuntu and Android booting and now the image is broken...
Yes, the image was broken because we're trying to be too clever in
supporting both Mir and SF. If we dropped SF support entirely, this
particular breakage wouldn't have happened.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
Description: Digital signature