ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-phone team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #12617
Re: Landing team 05.05.15
Hey Niklas!
It's as Oliver explained. Well, once the big switch happens there will
be no vivid-based devel-proposed images but instead we'll have
vivid-based stable-proposed ones ;)
Anyway, everything is still under active discussion and planning.
Cheers!
W dniu 05.05.2015 o 20:38, Niklas Wenzel pisze:
> Thank you very much for your great explanation, Oliver!
> In that case, I can live with vivid-based devel-proposed images. ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Niklas
>
> 2015-05-05 20:24 GMT+02:00 Oliver Grawert <ogra@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> hi,
>> Am Dienstag, den 05.05.2015, 20:00 +0200 schrieb Niklas Wenzel:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> Currently there are no plans of
>>> wily-based touch devices in the future, so we'll probably
>>> stick with
>>> vivid for nearest time. We might implement something similar
>>> to a
>>> dual-landing scheme, where every vivid landing would be
>>> auto-synced to
>>> wily, but this is still something under consideration.
>>>
>>>
>>> May I ask for the reason of that?
>>>
>> the phones need a stable base, do not worry, all features that would go
>> into a wily image will land in your vivid phone install.
>>
>> the planned switch of the phone to snappy will simply mean that a lot of
>> breakage will very likely happen in wily for a while. not rolling out
>> monthly OTAs is not really an option. stopping phone development until
>> wily has stabilized isn't either.
>>
>> so the base of the phone stays on vivid for the time being, development
>> and bug fixes happen there too, all of that will land in parallel in
>> wily as well, where we will eventually have experimental snappy images
>>
>> ciao
>> oli.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
>> Post to : ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
>
>
--
Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak
Foundations Team
lukasz.zemczak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.canonical.com
Follow ups
References