ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-phone team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #13223
Re: BQ4.5 damage, first report.
El día Friday, June 12, 2015 a las 01:07:54PM +0200, Michal Karnicki escribió:
> > Also keep in mind that an incoming call does not unlock the phone. It
> > just puts a stripped down version of the dialer on top of the lockscreen
>
>
>
> Until we have a feature of tracking down/manipulating/wiping a lost
> device, showing PIN entry before accepting a call would be the worst
> imaginable thing we could do. I also completely agree with what had been
> said by my colleagues - such security must not come at a cost of expected
> usability.
Couldn't this be implemented as a user configuration option? It could
even be done in that way that unlocking the device with the password/PIN
accepts automatically the call. This would not take much longer than
swiping, depends on how long the password/PIN is.
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz, guru@xxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.unixarea.de/ +49-170-4527211 +49-176-38902045
"Wenn der Mensch von den Umständen gebildet wird, so muß man die Umstände menschlich bilden."
"Si el hombre es formado por las circunstancias entonces es necesario formar humanamente
las circunstancias", Karl Marx in Die heilige Familie / La sagrada familia (MEW 2, 138)
References
-
Re: BQ4.5 damage, first report.
From: Dave Morley, 2015-06-11
-
Re: BQ4.5 damage, first report.
From: Christian Dywan, 2015-06-11
-
Re: BQ4.5 damage, first report.
From: wayne Ward, 2015-06-11
-
Re: BQ4.5 damage, first report.
From: Torsten Sachse, 2015-06-11
-
Re: BQ4.5 damage, first report.
From: Matthias Apitz, 2015-06-11
-
Re: BQ4.5 damage, first report.
From: Michael Zanetti, 2015-06-12
-
Re: BQ4.5 damage, first report.
From: Michal Karnicki, 2015-06-12