On 02.10.2015 09:09, Thomas Voß wrote:
To state this clearly: I do care about those use-cases, too. However,
as saviq points out correctly: The discussion has to evolve from a
pure
"Does not work for me, change it" to a more in-depth conversation that
allows us to tackle the actual problems instead of blindly giving up
our principles and guidelines.
To be fair, that really is an outcome of ignoring all those use cases
for years now. I totally understand the frustration...
It's not that people haven't come up with use cases since two years
already. Unless the subject of the email is similar to this one, there
weren't even replies to those mails, except other community people
saying that it's not possible due to the chosen lifecycle approach.
Br,
Michaeö