ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-phone team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #19832
Re: Announcement: Ubuntu Touch outdated framework deprecation
Hello Michel,
I would have to check this personally, but from the information I got
last week the emulator should be working mouse-input-wise at least.
There are still some issues with it which is why we didn't promote an
emulator OTA-10 yet.
Anyway, let me get back to you tomorrow.
Cheers,
W dniu 19.04.2016 o 00:50, Michel Renon pisze:
> Hi,
>
> Le 18/04/2016 19:50, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak a écrit :
>> Hello everyone!
>>
>> Getting back to all developers regarding the aforementioned framework
>> deprecation. We didn't deprecate those yet as we decided to give more
>> time for porting those to newer frameworks. Right now a month has passed
>> from the original announcement and we see that the count of applications
>> using the old frameworks didn't really change much.
>> We would still like to get rid of those as soon as possible.
>>
>> We will be removing those for OTA-11. If your application is using one
>> of the frameworks mentioned below, make sure to upgrade it before OTA-11
>> release (so in 4-5 weeks from now). rc-proposed will be getting the
>> frameworks removed slightly earlier, as always.
>>
>
> In order to update my app, I need the emulator, but I'm still blocked by
> bug #1517597, mouse pointer support in emulator [1].
>
> That bug is marked 'fix-released' for few weeks (OTA10), but it is still
> present in the last emulator images I created :
> - channel "ubuntu-touch/rc-proposed/ubuntu" revision 401
> - channel "ubuntu-touch/rc/ubuntu" revision 17
>
> I also looked at the 'decoder-ring' to check if they were the last
> versions, and if they integrate the OTA10.
>
>
>
> Can someone explain the status of that bug ?
> Did I missed something when creating emulator image?
>
> Thanks for any information,
> Cheers,
>
> Michel
>
>
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1517597
--
Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak
Foundations Team
lukasz.zemczak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.canonical.com
References