ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

[Filip Dorosz <filip.dorosz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi.

I believe some apps would be to resource hungry for limited abilities of 
mobile world. Firefox is quite good example, it is heavy and while 
porting it would be possible I believe it would not suite small screen, 
would drain battery quickly etc.

Regards,
Filip Dorosz.

W dniu 24.04.2016 o 12:21, Krzysztof Tataradziński pisze:
> Hello,
> For some time bothers me one topic. I'm not a programmer, so maybe
> answer to my question is obvious. In UT we have browser app created by
> Canonical team, yes? It's done almost from scratch and providing basic
> features. When UT was starting, why programmers team doesn't decide to,
> instead of creating new one, simply port ie. Firefox to fit UT?
> Does porting Firefox would consume less resources that creating new browser?
> It's general question for me - why there are many apps created again,
> istead of making some ports of existing apps?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof Tataradziński
> http://launchpad.net/~ktatar156