ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

[Matthias Apitz <guru@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

El d�Tuesday, June 07, 2016 a las 01:39:28PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Lallement escribi�> On 07/06/2016 13:24, Peter Spiers wrote:
> >Question,
> >
> >How does such get passed testing?
> It didn't, this is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/1581089.
> Some issues are not important enough to block the release compared
> to others.

I sligthly disagree. I'm using the alarm in my BQ E4.5 since one year on
five mornings a week, and until OTA-11 it was never the case that the
clock-app stayed open after alarm cancel. This is clearly a regression and I'm
asking if for normal (existing) functionality is some standard
anti-regression testing in place, i.e. tests to ensure that everything
else apart of new features does work as before?

	matthias

-- 
Matthias Apitz               |  /"\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign:
E-mail: guru@xxxxxxxxxxx     |  \ /   - No HTML/RTF in E-mail
WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ |   X    - No proprietary attachments
phone: +49-176-38902045      |  / \   - Respect for open standards
                             | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign