I think this is only the consequence of not having anyone from
Canonical expressing what was planned. When you let others communicate
for you, you have to expect some backfire.
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On mardi, 10 janvier, 2017 A. James Lewis <james@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The mails never actually said that there would not be an OTA-15, and the
fact that the system is not snap based does not stop the development of
Unity8 etc... so there is still a chance seeing another few updates,
before the snap migration....
Also the Android layer may yet get updated. I think its simply that
Canonical genuinely do not know if it will be possible to upgrade old
devices when the time comes.
James
On Tuesday, 10 January 2017 15:23:45 GMT, Gareth France
<gareth.france@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gareth.france@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
wrote:
>
>
> On 10/01/17 12:17, Paul Tait wrote:
>> I appreciate what you're saying, but that is the information that I've
>> gleaned from here.
> Yes I agree entirely. But I suspect that the exact wording can be
> provocative. Some people like to find the fire even if there is no
smoke!
>
--
Sent using Dekko from my Ubuntu device
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
<https://launchpad.net/%7Eubuntu-phone>
Post to : ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
<https://launchpad.net/%7Eubuntu-phone>
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
