ubuntu-touch-coreapps team mailing list archive

[Zisu Andrei <matzipan@xxxxxxxxx>]

>
> This could be quite dangerous, in multiple aspects.

Well, detail your case. But I don't see how an API would be dangerous as
long as you keep some access policies.

But having (maybe) multiple reader apps seamlessly working on the same data
doesn't sound bad to me at all.

For data that needs to be available across computers, U1Db should be the
> answer.

> What's Canonical's input on this?

This is the answer I was looking for. Didn't know of the existance of this.





Zisu Andrei


On 8 March 2013 11:36, Octavian Damiean <odamiean@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Zisu Andrei <matzipan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Well, basically, this would allow multiple apps to access the same data.
>> But we risk having the data corrupted... so I guess that would make the
>> case for a future API...
>>
>
> This could be quite dangerous, in multiple aspects.
>