ubuntu-translations-coordinators team mailing list archive

[Kenneth Nielsen <k.nielsen81@xxxxxxxxx>]

Den 01-12-2011 15:17, David Planella skrev:
> Al 01/12/11 13:18, En/na Kenneth Nielsen ha escrit:
> > Den 22-11-2011 14:36, David Planella skrev:
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > As discussed at UDS, and following up on the feedback that everyone
> > > found them useful, I'd like to kick off the sustainable translations
> > > calls with the Translations Coordinators.
> > >
> > > I'm conscious that last cycle I did not keep up with posting the notes.
> > > This cycle I'd like to improve this and start reusing the old
> > > translations meetings wiki pages [1] to keep public track of the
> > > discussions.
> > >
> > > If you've got any agenda items for the next call, please feel free to
> > > add them to:
> > >
> > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Translations/Meetings/Next
> > >
> > > Regarding the time of the call, I was thinking of:
> > >
> > > * Starting this Thursday
> > > * Biweekly calls (or would you like to do them weekly?)
> > > * Time: either 12:00 UTC or 16:00 UTC (I'm open to more suggestions)
> > >
> > > Please let me know what you think.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > David
> > >
> > > [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Translations/Meetings
> >
> > I just got a round to looking at the invite to these meetings. 2
> > questions. It seems that it is now 1700 UTC in stead of 1600 UTC and
> > always on thursdays. This means that I won't be able to participate at
> > all untill next summer. Was there no other way to do that, a time that
> > fist everyone better or the option to rotate between days?
>
> I thought you'd said that the latter the better for you on your last
> reply, but I'm happy to change the day or the time if it means more of
> us can make it.
>
> What works best for you?

I think it was Gabor that said that. My schedule is a bit messed up as a 
I have scheduled evening event on 3 weekdays. What I can do is:
Mon and tue: 1600 UTC
Wed: anytime in 1600 UTC + 7 hours
Thu: No go

But we could also rotate days, to make it easier for everyone to attend 
at some time.

> > I saw that it was supposed to be skype. I never got any feedback on what
> > the problem was with the G+ functionality. Quite frankly with Skypes
> > Linux track record (sound support) I would rather not use that
> > particular binary blob of sloppy.
>
> Then you'll be happy to hear that we started using G+ on the last call :)

Nice.


> Cheers,
> David.