ufl team mailing list archive
-
ufl team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01492
[HG UFL] Fixed lhs/rhs bug, turns out it was in the list_tensor handler.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
>> Quoting Harish Narayanan <harish.mlists@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>> Garth N. Wells wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Harish Narayanan wrote:
>>>>> Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
>>>>>> I fixed _something_...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now I'm getting:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Visiting Zero: Zero((), (), {})
>>>>>> Zero is not supported (yet).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *** FFC: Zero is not supported (yet).
>>>>>> *** FFC: To get more information about this error, rerun FFC with
>>>>>> --debug.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And sfc fails to compile the form for some other reason.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am just writing to note that the original form I was trying to compile
>>>>> where I noticed this error (it was not a system) is now working.
>>>>>
>>>> What's the status of this? Is it critical enough to hold up a release
>>>> (more to the point, a release of all the other FEniCS components which
>>>> is long overdue)?
>>> I just checked this and the case that Martin mentioned (which has a zero
>>> rhs) still doesn't work.
>>
>> I wouldn't call this a bug, it's just a missing implementation. We have a ton of
>> other things that are not implemented/supported yet, so if we have to wait for
>> all that, the release will never happen.
>> At least it crashes with a sensible error message.
>>
>
> OK. So unless someone is working on resolving it imminently. I suggest
> that we move forward with a release.
>
> Garth
I concur.
Martin
Follow ups
References
-
[HG UFL] Fixed lhs/rhs bug, turns out it was in the list_tensor handler.
From: UFL, 2009-09-22
-
Re: [HG UFL] Fixed lhs/rhs bug, turns out it was in the list_tensor handler.
From: Harish Narayanan, 2009-09-22
-
Re: [HG UFL] Fixed lhs/rhs bug, turns out it was in the list_tensor handler.
From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2009-09-22
-
Re: [HG UFL] Fixed lhs/rhs bug, turns out it was in the list_tensor handler.
From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2009-09-22
-
Re: [HG UFL] Fixed lhs/rhs bug, turns out it was in the list_tensor handler.
From: Harish Narayanan, 2009-09-22
-
Re: [HG UFL] Fixed lhs/rhs bug, turns out it was in the list_tensor handler.
From: Garth N. Wells, 2009-09-23
-
Re: [HG UFL] Fixed lhs/rhs bug, turns out it was in the list_tensor handler.
From: Harish Narayanan, 2009-09-23
-
Re: [HG UFL] Fixed lhs/rhs bug, turns out it was in the list_tensor handler.
From: Kristian Oelgaard, 2009-09-23
-
Re: [HG UFL] Fixed lhs/rhs bug, turns out it was in the list_tensor handler.
From: Garth N. Wells, 2009-09-23