ufl team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

It seems to work fine, but some unit tests are failing since
reconstruct is only implemented for FiniteElement (not for mixed
elements etc).

Could you add a suitable reconstruct for mixed elements? I'm not sure
how it should be done, in particular how the input should be
propagated to the subelements.

--
Anders



On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:37:08PM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> Be aware that form_data.elements and friends are _after_ mapping, so
> if you get to the dolfin.FunctionSpaces through them something must be
> changed. If you get them from the original functions everything should
> be fine though.
>
> Martin
>
> On 12 May 2011 22:30, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:22:51PM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> >> On 12 May 2011 22:21, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 08:39:55PM +0200, Anders Logg wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 07:39:39PM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> >> >> > I've pushed some changes to lp:~martinal/ufl/reconstruction mostly
> >> >> > implementing the ufl side of taking an (optional) element_mapping
> >> >> > as input to preprocess, but I want to test it a bit more before pushing
> >> >> > to trunk.
> >> >>
> >> >> ok. I'm currently working on sorting out some remaining cache problems
> >> >> in the FFC JIT compiler. That should hopefully take care of the
> >> >> remaining tests that fail in DOLFIN. When that works, I can try out
> >> >> the reconstruction.
> >> >
> >> > Is it safe to try out the new element replacement now?
> >>
> >> Yes, I even checked it in. element_mapping is None by default, just
> >> try adding it.
> >
> > ok, will try.
> >
> >