unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02298
Re: No "application bucket" needed
Thanks for the clarification app vs. app with service, and I don't
feel managing the lifetime of thise services to be a general problem
(if it is it is a bug).
I guess users will quickly learn that services behave as you state two
messages above and apps continue to behave (and be under more direct
control of the user). This also provides good guidance of what class
of software has a place on the panel.
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Mark Shuttleworth <mark@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 19/05/10 02:30, Walter Wittel wrote:
>> Also I may want to close Gimp with bunches of large images to free up
>> resources rather than having a half dozen smaller apps terminate so I
>> can launch something else.
>
> Gimp is not a service, it doesn't show in the panel. Closing the Gimp
> app terminates Gimp.
>
> Mark
>
>
References
-
Windicators
From: Roth Robert, 2010-05-03
-
Re: Windicators
From: Akshat Jain, 2010-05-16
-
Re: Windicators
From: Sense Hofstede, 2010-05-16
-
No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-16
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Matthew Paul Thomas, 2010-05-18
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: David Hamm, 2010-05-18
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Dylan McCall, 2010-05-18
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: David Hamm, 2010-05-18
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Walter Wittel, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-19