unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02308
Re: No "application bucket" needed
I think this handles the issues very cleanly and elegantly.
-without a doubt
Rhythmbox able to restore its previous state upon launch and all the
other nuances would truly make it organic, to complete that piece
though, either remove the minimize or close button. The later, keep in
mind, would associate this functionality with other applications
however - which might be good.
Put another way, with the system-tray functionality there is no longer
a need for Rhythmbox to be in the tray. Hence there is no need for
both a minimize and close.
Doing so would clearly state Ubuntu as heading tword a more android or
user oriented like platform.
Follow ups
References
-
Windicators
From: Roth Robert, 2010-05-03
-
Re: Windicators
From: Akshat Jain, 2010-05-16
-
Re: Windicators
From: Sense Hofstede, 2010-05-16
-
No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-16
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Matthew Paul Thomas, 2010-05-18
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: David Hamm, 2010-05-18
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Dylan McCall, 2010-05-18
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Sense Hofstede, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-19