unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03041
Re: Updating UI issues
"Matthew Paul Thomas" <mpt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Scott Kitterman wrote on 22/06/10 11:54:
>>
>> "Matthew Paul Thomas" <mpt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>...
>>> Yes, we agreed at UDS that we should move towards installing updates
>>> automatically whenever possible. But it's still important to make the
>>> interface for manual updates interface the best we can.
>>
>> We did? The current updates framework is almost completely unsuitable
>> for this.
>>...
>
>Yes.
><https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-m-update-manager-incremental-updates>
>
I don't think that's what that spec says. It discusses offering automatic updates more prominently and making them work better. Your description sounded to me like an intention to make them opt-out. As long as they are opt-in, I think that spec is completely reasonable.
Scott K
Follow ups
References
-
Updating UI issues
From: Shane Fagan, 2010-05-26
-
Re: Updating UI issues
From: Matthew Paul Thomas, 2010-06-18
-
Re: Updating UI issues
From: Shane Fagan, 2010-06-18
-
Re: Updating UI issues
From: Matthew Paul Thomas, 2010-06-20
-
Re: Updating UI issues
From: Shane Fagan, 2010-06-20
-
Re: Updating UI issues
From: Matthew Paul Thomas, 2010-06-21
-
Re: Updating UI issues
From: David Hamm, 2010-06-21
-
Re: Updating UI issues
From: Matthew Paul Thomas, 2010-06-22
-
Re: Updating UI issues
From: Scott Kitterman, 2010-06-22
-
Re: Updating UI issues
From: Matthew Paul Thomas, 2010-06-22